# Introduction to Fortran¶

Note

To learn any new programming language good learning resources are important. This introduction covers the basic language features you will need for this course but Fortran offers much more functionality.

Good resources can be found at fortran-lang.org. Especially the learn category offers useful introductory material to Fortran programming and links to additional resources.

The fortran90.org offers a rich portfolio of Fortran learning material. For students with prior experience in other programming languages like Python the Rosetta Stone might offer a good starting point as well.

Also, the Fortran Wiki has plenty of good material on Fortran and offers a comprehensive overview over many language features and programming models.

An active forum of the Fortran community is the fortran-lang discourse. While we offer our own forum solution for this course to discuss and troubleshoot, you are more than welcome to engage with the Fortran community there as well. Just be mindful when starting threads specific to this course and tag them as Help or Homework.

## General Principles¶

Programming is the art of telling a computer what to do, usually to perform an action or solve a problem which would be too difficult or laborious to do by hand. It thus involves the following steps:

1. Understanding the problem.

2. Formulating an approach/algorithm to the problem.

3. Translating the algorithm into a computer–compatible language: Coding

4. Compiling and running the program.

5. Analyzing the result and improving the program if necessary or desired.

This manual assumes that steps 1 and 2 have already been taken care of in the Quantum Chemistry I module. We will thus concern ourselves with the problems of translating an algorithm or a formula, spelled out on paper, to something the computer understands first.

## Compiling and Running a Program¶

Before beginning to write computer code or to code in short, one needs to choose a programming language. Many of them exist: some are general, some are specifically designed for a task, e.g. web site design or piloting a plane, some have simple data structures, some have very special data structures like census data, some are rather new and follow very modern principles, some have a long history and thus rely on time-tested concepts.

In the case of this module, the Fortran programming language is chosen because it makes for code that is rather rapidly written with decent performance. It is also in frequent use in the field of quantum chemistry and scientific computing. The name Fortran is derived from Formula Translation and indicates that the language is designed for the task at hand, translating scientific equations into computer code.

Let’s take a look at a complete Fortran program.

hello.f90
 1 2 3 program hello write(*, *) "This is probably the simplest Fortran program" end program hello 

If you were to execute this program, it would simply display its message and exit.

Exercise 1

Open a new file in atom and save as hello.f90 in a new directory in your project directory, you will always create a new directory for each exercise.

Type in the program above. Fortran is case-insensitive, i.e. it mostly does not care about capitalization. Save the code to a file named hello.f90. All files written in the Fortran format must have the .f90 extension.

Next, you will check that the file you created is where you need it, translate your program using the compiler gfortran to machine code. The resulting binary file can be executed, thus usually called executable.

gfortran hello.f90 -o helloprog
./helloprog
This is probably the simplest Fortran program.


Directly after the gfortran command, you find the input file name. The -o flag allows you to name your program. Try to leave out the -o helloprog part and translate hello.f90 again with gfortran. You will find that the default name for your executable is a.out. They should produce the same output.

Now that we can translate our program, we should check what it needs to create an executable, create an empty file empty.f90 and try to translate it with gfortran.

gfortran empty.f90
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/Scrt1.o: in function _start':
(.text+0x24): undefined reference to main'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status


This did not work as expected, gfortran tells you that your program is missing a main which it was about to start. The main program in Fortran is indicated by the program statement, which is not present in the empty file we gave to gfortran.

Important note about errors

Errors are not necessarily a bad thing, most of the programs you will use in this course will return useful error messages that will help you to learn about the underlying mechanisms and syntax.

Just consider it as an error driven development technique!

Let us reexamine the code in hello.f90, The first line is the declaration section which starts the main program and gives it an arbitrary name. The third line is the termination section which stops the execution of the program again and tells the compiler that we are done. The name used in this section has to match the declaration section.

Everything in between is the execution section, each statement in this section is executed when calling the translated program. We use the write(*, *) statement which causes the program to display whatever is behind it until the end of the line. The double quotes enclosing the sentence make the program recognize that the following characters are just that, i.e., a sequence of characters (called a string) and not programming directives or variables.

## The Fortran package manager¶

The Fortran package manager (fpm) is a recent advancement introduced by the Fortran community. It helps to abstract common tasks when developing Fortran applications like building and running executables or creating new projects.

Warning

The Fortran package manager is still a relatively new project. Using new and recent software always has some risks of running into unexpected issues. We have carefully evaluated fpm and the advantage of the simple user interface outweighs potential issues.

This course is structured such that it can be completed with or without using fpm.

Note

If you are doing this course on a machine in the Mulliken center you have to activate the fpm installation by using the module commands:

module use /home/abt-grimme/modulefiles


Create a new project with fpm by

fpm new --app myprogram


This will initialize a new Fortran project with a simple program setup. Enter the newly created directory and run it with

cd myprogram
fpm run
...
hello from project myprogram


You can inspect the scaffold generated in app/main.f90 and find a similar program unit as in your very first Fortran program:

app/main.f90
 1 2 3 4 5 program main implicit none print *, "hello from project myproject" end program main 

Modify the source code with your editor of choice and simply invoke fpm run again. You will find that fpm takes care of automatically rebuilding your program before running it.

Tip

By default fpm enables compile time checks and run time checks that are absent in the plain compiler invocation. Those can help you catch and avoid common errors when developing in Fortran.

To read more on the capabilities of fpm check the help page with

fpm help


## Introducing Variables¶

The string we have printed in our program was a character constant, thus we are not able to manipulate it. Variables are used to store and manipulate data in our programs, to declare variables we extend the declaration section of our program. We can use variables similar to the ones used in math in that they can have different values. Within Fortran, they cannot be used as unknowns in an equation; only in an assignment.

In Fortran, we need to declare the type of every variable explicitly, this means that a variable is given a specific and unchanging data type like character, integer or real. For example, we could write

numbers.f90
 1 2 3 4 5 6 program numbers implicit none integer :: my_number my_number = 42 write(*, *) "My number is", my_number end program numbers 

Now the declaration section of our program in line 1-3, the second line declares that we want to declare all our variables explicitly. Implicit typing is a leftover from the earliest version of Fortran and should be avoided at all cost, therefore you will put the line implicit none in every declaration you write from now on. The third line declares the variable my_number as type integer.

Line 4 and 5 are the executable section of the program, first, we assign a value to my_number, then we are printing it to the screen.

Exercise 2

Make a new directory and create the file numbers.f90 where you type in the above program. Then translate it with gfortran with

gfortran numbers.f90 -o numbers_prog
./numbers_prog
My number is          42

fpm run
+ build/gfortran_debug/app/myproject
My number is          42


Despite being a bit oddly formatted the program correctly returned the number we have written in numbers.f90. numbers_prog will now always return the same number, to make the program useful, we want to have the program read in our number.

Use the read(*, *) statement to provide the number to the program, which works similar to the write(*, *) statement.

Solutions 2

We replace the assignment in line 4 with the read(*, *) my_number and then translate it to a program.

gfortran numbers.f90 -o numbers_prog
./numbers_prog
31
My number is          31

fpm run
+ build/gfortran_debug/app/myproject
31
My number is          31


If you now execute numbers_prog the shell freezes. We are now exactly at the read statement and the numbers_prog is waiting for your action, so go ahead and type a number.

You might be tempted to type something like four:

./numbers_prog
four
At line 4 of file numbers.f90 (unit = 5, file = 'stdin')
Fortran runtime error: Bad integer for item 1 in list input

Error termination. Backtrace:
#0  0x7efe31de5e1b in read_integer
#1  0x7efe31de8e29 in list_formatted_read_scalar
#2  0x7efe31def535 in wrap_scalar_transfer
at /build/gcc/src/gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:2369
#3  0x7efe31def535 in wrap_scalar_transfer
at /build/gcc/src/gcc/libgfortran/io/transfer.c:2346
#4  0x56338a59f23b in ???
#5  0x56338a59f31a in ???
#6  0x7efe31867ee2 in ???
#7  0x56338a59f0fd in ???
#8  0xffffffffffffffff in ???

fpm run
+ build/gfortran_debug/app/numbers
Enter an integer value
four
At line 5 of file app/main.f90 (unit = 5, file = 'stdin')
Fortran runtime error: Bad integer for item 1 in list input

Error termination. Backtrace:
#0  0x7fb170e6ffdb in read_integer
#1  0x7fb170e73229 in list_formatted_read_scalar
#2  0x561f44a562a0 in numbers
at app/main.f90:5
#3  0x561f44a5637f in main
at app/main.f90:7
Command failed
ERROR STOP


So we got an error here, the program is printing a lot of cryptic information, but the most useful lines are near to our input of four. We have produced an error at the runtime of our Fortran program, therefore it is called a runtime error, more precise we have given a bad integer value for the first item in the list input at line 4 in numbers.f90. That was very verbose, Fortran expected an integer, but we passed a character to our read statement for my_number.

We could try to make our program more verbose by adding some information on what kind of input we expect to avoid this sort of errors. A possible solution would look like

numbers.f90
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 program numbers implicit none integer :: my_number write(*, *) "Enter an integer value" read(*, *) my_number write(*, *) "My number is", my_number end program numbers 

While this will not prevent wrong input it will make it more unlikely by clearly communicating with the user of the program what we are expecting.

## Performing Simple Computing Tasks¶

Next, you will make your program perform simple computational tasks – in this case, add two numbers.

So let’s examine the following code:

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 program add implicit none ! declare variables: integers integer :: a, b integer :: res ! get two values to be stored in a and b read(*, *) a, b res = a + b ! perform the addition write(*, *) "The result is", res end program add 

Again we declare our program and give it a useful name describing the task at hand. The second statement is used to explicitly declare all variables and will be present in any program we write from now on.

The third line is a comment, any text after the exclamation mark is considered to be a comment in Fortran and is ignored by the compiler. Since it does not affect the final program we can use comments to remind ourselves why we choose to do something particular, the intent of the statement or to describe what the program is doing. In the beginning, you should comment your code as much as possible such that you will still understand them in a year from now. It is completely fine to produce more comment lines than lines of code to keep your program understandable. Also notice that Fortran does not care much about leading spaces (indentation) or empty lines, so we can use them to give our code a visual structure, which makes it more appealing and easier to read.

The comment states that we will declare our variables as integers, we have two integer declarations here, once for a and b, comma-separated on the same line and the next line an integer declaration for res. We could put a, b, res on one line, but we might want to separate our input and result variables visually.

The next statement is in line 8 in the executable section of the code and reads values into a and b. Afterward, we perform the addition a + b and assign the result to res. Finally, we print the result and exit the program again.

Exercise 3

Create the file add.f90 from the manual and modify it to make it do the following and check

1. Display a message to the user of your program (via write statements) about what kind of input is to be entered by them.

2. Read values from the console into the variables a and b, which are then multiplied and printed out. For error checking, print out the values a and b in the course of your program.

3. What happens if you provide input like 3.14?

4. Perform a division instead of a multiplication. Attempt to obtain a fraction.

Solutions 3

As before we add a line like write(*, *) "Enter two numbers to add" before the read statement. We can do something similar like in numbers for both a and b to echo their values, the resulting shell history should look similar to this

gfortran add -o add_prog
Enter two numbers to add
11 31
The value of a is          11
The value of b is          31
The result is          42
Enter two numbers to add
-8
298
The value of a is          -8
The value of b is         298
The result is         290

fpm run
Enter two numbers to add
11 31
The value of a is          11
The value of b is          31
The result is          42
fpm run
Enter two numbers to add
-8
298
The value of a is          -8
The value of b is         298
The result is         290


The input seems to be quite forgiving and we can also add negative numbers. While this sounds obvious it is a common pitfall in other languages, but in Fortran all integers are signed and there is no unsigned version like in C.

To change the arithmetic operation in our code we have to know the operator used in Fortran to perform anything beyond addition. We can use + for addition, - for subtraction, * for multiplication, / for division and ** exponentiation.

We will skip the resulting output of the multiplication, except for one interesting case (you should have created a new file and a new program for the multiplication, since there is nothing worse than a program called add_prog performing multiplications).

./multiply_prog
Enter two numbers to multiply
1000000 1000000
The value of a is     1000000
The value of b is     1000000
The result is  -727379968

fpm run
+ build/gfortran_debug/app/muliply
Enter two numbers to multiply
1000000 1000000
The value of a is     1000000
The value of b is     1000000
The result is  -727379968


which is kind of surprising. Take a piece of paper or perform the multiplication in your head, you will probably something pretty close to 1,000,000,000,000 instead of -727,379,968, but the computer is not as smart as you. We choose the default kind of the integer data types which uses 32 bits (4 bytes) to represent whole numbers in a range from -2,147,483,648 to +2,147,483,648 or –231 to +231 using two’s complement arithmetic, since the expected result is too large to be represented with only 32 bits (4 bytes), the result is truncated and the sign bit is left toggled which results in a large negative number (which is called an integer overflow, to understand why that makes sense lookup two’s complement arithmetic).

Usually, you do not have to worry about exceeding the 32 bits (4 bytes) of precision since we have data types that can represent such large numbers in a better way.

Finally, think carefully about the result you expect when performing division with integers. Test your hypothesis with your division program. Note for yourself what to expect when trying to obtain fractions from integers.

## Accuracy of Numbers¶

We already noted in the last exercise that we can create numbers not representable by integers like very large numbers or decimal numbers, therefore we have to resort to real numbers declared by the real data type.

Let us consider the following program using real variables

accuracy.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 program accuracy implicit none real :: a, b, c a = 1.0 b = 6.0 c = a / b write(*, *) 'a is', a write(*, *) 'b is', b write(*, *) 'c is', c end program accuracy 

We translate accuracy.f90 to an executable and run it to find that it is not that accurate

gfortran accuracy.f90 -o accuracy_test
./accuracy.test
a is   1.00000000
b is   6.00000000
c is  0.166666672

fpm run
+ build/gfortran_debug/app/accuracy
a is   1.00000000
b is   6.00000000
c is  0.166666672


Similar to our integer arithmetic test, real (floating point) arithmetic has also limitation. The default representation uses 32 bits (4 bytes) to represent the floating-point number, which results in 6 significant digits, before the result starts to differ from what we would expect, by doing the calculation on a piece of paper or in our head.

Now consider the following program

kinds.f90
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 program kinds implicit none intrinsic :: selected_real_kind integer :: single, double single = selected_real_kind(6) double = selected_real_kind(15) write(*, *) "For 6 significant digits", single, "bytes are required" write(*, *) "For 15 significant digits", double, "bytes are required" end program kinds 

The intrinsic :: selected_real_kinds declares that we are using a built-in function from the Fortran compiler. This one returns the kind of real we need to represent a floating-point number with the specified significant digits.

Exercise 4

1. create a file kinds.f90 and run it to determine the necessary kind of your floating-point variables.

2. use the syntax real(kind) :: to modify accuracy.f90 to employ what we call double-precision floating-point numbers. Replace kind with the number you determined in kinds.f90.

Solutions 4

The output of the second write statement should be 8 on most machines.

But instead of hardcoding our wanted precision we combine kinds.f90 and accuracy.f90 in the final program version.

accuracy.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 program accuracy implicit none intrinsic :: selected_real_kind ! kind parameter for real variables integer, parameter :: wp = selected_real_kind(15) real(wp) :: a, b, c ! also use the kind parameter here a = 1.0_wp b = 6.0_wp c = a / b write(*, *) 'a is', a write(*, *) 'b is', b write(*, *) 'c is', c end program accuracy 

If we now translate accuracy.f90 we find that the output changed, we got more digits printed and also a more accurate, but still not perfect result

gfortran accuracy.f90 -o accuracy_test
./accuracy.test
a is   1.00000000000000
b is   6.00000000000000
c is  0.166666666666667

fpm run
+ build/gfortran_debug/app/accuracy
a is   1.00000000000000
b is   6.00000000000000
c is  0.166666666666667


It is important to notice here that we cannot get the same result we would evaluate on a piece of paper since the precision is still limited by the representation of the number.

Finally, we want to highlight line 6 in accuracy, the parameter attached to the data type (here integer) is used to declare variables that are constant and unchangeable through the course of our program, more important, their value is known (by the compiler) while translating the program. This gives us the possibility to assign meaningful and easy to remember names to important values.

There is one more issue we have to discuss, look at the following program which does the same calculation as accuracy.f90, but with different kinds of literals.

literals.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 program literals implicit none intrinsic :: selected_real_kind ! kind parameter for real variables integer, parameter :: wp = selected_real_kind(15) real(wp) :: a, b, c a = 1.0_wp / 6.0_wp b = 1.0 / 6.0 c = 1 / 6 write(*, *) 'a is', a write(*, *) 'b is', b write(*, *) 'c is', c end program literals 

If we run the program now we find surprisingly that only a has the expected value, while all others are off. We can easily explain the result for c, the actual calculation is happening in integer arithmetic which yields 0 and is then cast into a real number 0.0.

a is  0.16666666666666666
b is  0.16666667163372040
c is  0.00000000000000000


But what happens in case of b, we perform the calculation with 1.0/6.0, but those are a real number from the default type represented in 32 bits (4 bytes) and then, as we store the result in b, casted into a real number represented in 64 bits (8 bytes).

Important

Always specify the kind parameters in floating-point literals!

Here we introduce the concept of casting one data type to another, whenever a variable is assigned a different data type, the compiler has to convert it first, which is called casting.

Possible Errors

You might ask what happens if we leave out the parameter attribute in line 6, let’s try it out:

accuracy.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 program accuracy implicit none intrinsic :: selected_real_kind ! kind parameter for real variables integer :: wp = selected_real_kind(15) real(wp) :: a, b, c ! also use the kind parameter here a = 1.0_wp b = 6.0_wp c = a / b write(*, *) 'a is', a write(*, *) 'b is', b write(*, *) 'c is', c end program accuracy 

gfortran complains about errors in the source code, pointing you at line 7, with several errors following, as usual, the first error is the interesting one:

accuracy.f90:7:7:

7 |   real(wp) :: a, b, c
|       1
Error: Parameter ‘wp’ at (1) has not been declared or is a variable, which does not reduce to a constant expression
accuracy.f90:10:12:

10 |   a = 1.0_wp
|            1
Error: Missing kind-parameter at (1)
...


There we find the solution to our problem in plain text, the parameter wp, which is not a parameter in our program, is either not declared (it is) or it is a variable. gfortran expects a parameter here, but we passed a variable. All other errors result from either the missing parameter attribute or that gfortran could not translate line 7 due to the first error.

Therefore, always check for the first error that occurs.

You could also ask how important line 4 with intrinsic :: is for our program. You could leave it out completely (try it!), but we will always declare all the intrinsic functions we are using here such that you know they are, indeed, intrinsic functions.

## Logical Constructs¶

Our programs so far had one line of execution. Logic is very fundamental for controlling the execution flow of a program, usually, you evaluate logical expression directly in the corresponding if construct to decide which branch to take or save it to a logical variable.

Now we want to solve for the roots of the quadratic equation $$x^2 + px + q = 0$$, we know that we can easily solve it by

$x = -\frac{p}{2} \pm \sqrt{\frac{p^2}{4} - q}$

but we have to consider different cases for the number of roots we obtain from this equation (or we use complex numbers). We have to be able to evaluate conditions and create branches dependent on the conditions for our code to evaluate. Check out the following program to find roots

roots.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 program roots implicit none ! sqrt is the square root and abs is the absolute value intrinsic :: selected_real_kind, sqrt, abs integer, parameter :: wp = selected_real_kind(15) real(wp) :: p, q real(wp) :: d ! request user input write(*, *) "Solving x² + p·x + q = 0, please enter p and q" read(*, *) p, q d = 0.25_wp * p**2 - q ! descriminant is positive, we have two real roots if (d > 0.0_wp) then write(*, *) "x1 =", -0.5_wp * p + sqrt(d) write(*, *) "x2 =", -0.5_wp * p - sqrt(d) ! descriminant is negative, we have two complex roots else if (d < 0.0_wp) then write(*, *) "x1 =", -0.5_wp * p, "+ i ·", sqrt(abs(d)) write(*, *) "x2 =", -0.5_wp * p, "- i ·", sqrt(abs(d)) else ! descriminant is zero, we have only one root write(*, *) "x1 = x2 =", -0.5_wp * p endif end program roots 

Exercise 5

1. check the conditions for simple cases, start by setting up quadratic equations with known roots and compare your results against the program.

2. Extend the program to solve the equation: $$ax^2 + bx + c = 0$$.

Fortran offers also a logical data type, the literal logical values are .true. and .false. (notice the dots enclosing true and false values).

Note

Programmer coming from C or C++ may find it unintuitive that Fortran stores a logical in 32 bits (4 bytes) similar to an integer and that true and false are not 1 and 0.

You already saw two operators, greater than > and less than <, for a complete list of all operators see the following table. They always come in two versions but have the same meaning.

Operation

symbol

.op.

example (var is integer)

equals

==

.eq.

var == 1, var.eq.1

not equals

/=

.ne.

var /= 5, var.ne.5

greater than

>

.gt.

var > 0, var.gt.0

greater equal

>=

.ge.

var >= 10, var.ge.10

less than

<

.lt.

var < 3, var.lt.3

less equal

<=

.ge.

var <= 8, var.le.8

Note

You cannot compare two logical expressions with each other using the operators above, but this is usually not necessary. If you find yourself comparing two logical expressions with each other, rethink the logic in your program first, most of the time is just some superfluous construct. If you are sure that it is really necessary, use .eqv. and .neqv. for the task.

To negate a logical expression we use prepend .not. to the expression and to test multiple expressions we can use .or. and .and. which have the same meaning as their equivalent operators in logic.

Consider this simple program for summing up its input

loop.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 program loop implicit none integer :: i integer :: number ! initialize number = 0 do read(*, *) i if (i <= 0) then exit else number = number + i end if end do write(*, *) "Sum of all input", number end program loop 

Here we introduce a new construct called do-loop. The content enclosed in the do/end do block will be repeated until the exit statement is reached. Here we continue summing up as long as we are getting positive integer values (coded in its negated form as exit if the user input is lesser than or equal to zero).

Exercise 6

1. there is no reason to limit us to positive values, modify the program such that it also takes negative values and breaks at zero.

Solutions 6

You might have tried to exchange the condition for i = 0, but since the equal sign is reserved for the assignment gfortran will throw an error like this one

loop.f90:9:10:

9 |     if (i = 0) then
|          1
Error: Syntax error in IF-expression at (1)
loop.f90:11:8:

11 |     else
|        1
Error: Unexpected ELSE statement at (1)
loop.f90:13:7:

13 |     end if
|       1
Error: Expecting END DO statement at (1)


It is a common pitfall in other programming languages to confuse the assignment operator with the equal operator, which is fundamentally different. While it is syntactically correct in C to use an assignment in a conditional statement, the resulting code is often in error. In Fortran, the assignment does not return a value (unlike in C), therefore the code is logically and syntactically wrong. We are better off using the correct == or .eq. operator here.

Now that we know the basic loop construction from Fortran, we will introduce two special versions, which you will encounter more frequently in the future. First, the loop we set up in the example before, did not terminate without us specifying a condition. We can add the condition directly to the loop using the do while(<condition>) construct instead.

while.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 program while_loop implicit none integer :: i integer :: number ! initialize number = 0 read(*, *) i do while(i > 0) number = number + i read(*, *) i end do write(*, *) "Sum of all input", number end program while_loop 

This shifts the condition to the beginning of the loop, so we have to restructure our execution sequence a bit to match the new logical flow of the program. Here, we save the if and exit, but have to provide the read statement twice.

Imagine we do not want to sum arbitrary numbers but make a cumulative sum over a range of numbers. In this case, we would use another version of the do loop as given here:

sum.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 program cumulative_sum implicit none integer :: i, n integer :: number ! initialize number = 0 read(*, *) n do i = 1, n number = number + i end do write(*, *) "Sum is", number end program cumulative_sum 

You might notice we had to introduce another variable n for the upper bound of the range, because we made i now our loop counter, which is automatically incremented for each repetition of the loop, also you don’t have to care about the termination condition, as it is generated automatically by the specified range.

Important

Never write to the loop counter variable inside its loop.

Exercise 7

1. Check the results by comparing them to your previous programs for summing integer.

2. What happens if you provide a negative upper bound?

3. The lower bound is fixed to one, make it adjustable by user input. Compare the results again with your previous programs.

Now, if we want to sum only even numbers in our cumulative sum, we could try to add a condition in our loop:

sum.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 program cumulative_sum implicit none intrinsic :: modulo integer :: i, n integer :: number ! initialize number = 0 read(*, *) n do i = 1, n if (modulo(i, 2) == 1) cycle number = number + i end do write(*, *) "Sum is", number end program cumulative_sum 

The cycle instruction breaks out of the current iteration, but not out of the complete loop like exit. Here we use it together with the intrinsic modulo function to determine the remainder of our loop counter variable in every step and cycle in case we find a reminder of one, meaning an odd number.

Note

Programmers coming from almost any language might find it confusing to start counting at 1. It was adopted as default choice because of it is the natural choice (for non-programmers at least), but Fortran does not limit you there, there are scenarios where counting from -l to +l is the better choice, i.e. for orbital angular momenta.

You can also start counting from 0, but please keep in mind that most people also find it unintuitive to start counting from 0.

## Fields and Arrays of Data¶

So far we dealt with scalar data, for more complex programs we will need fields of data, like a set of cartesian coordinates or the overlap matrix. Fortran provides first-class multidimensional array support.

array.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 program array implicit none intrinsic :: sum, product, maxval, minval integer :: vec(3) ! get all elements from standard input read(*, *) vec ! produce some results write(*, *) "Sum of all elements", sum(vec) write(*, *) "Product of all elemnts", product(vec) write(*, *) "Maximal/minimal value at", maxval(vec), minval(vec) end program array 

We denote arrays by adding the dimension in parenthesis behind the variable, in this we choose a range from 1 to 3, resulting in 3 elements.

Exercise 8

1. Expand the above program to work on a 3 by 3 matrix

2. The sum and product can also work on only one of the two dimensions, try to use them only for the rows or columns of the matrix

Usually, we do not know the size of the array in advance, to deal with this issue we have to make the array allocatable and explicitly request the memory at runtime

array.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 program array implicit none intrinsic :: sum, product, maxval, minval integer :: ndim integer, allocatable :: vec(:) ! read the dimension of the vector first read(*, *) ndim ! request the necessary memory allocate(vec(ndim)) ! now read the ndim elements of the vector read(*, *) vec write(*, *) "Sum of all elements", sum(vec) write(*, *) "Product of all elemnts", product(vec) write(*, *) "Maximal/minimal value at", maxval(vec), minval(vec) end program array 

Exercise 9

1. What happens if you provide zero as dimension? Does the behavior match your expectations?

2. Try to allocate your array with a lower bound unequal to 1 by using something like allocate(vec(lower:upper))

Up to now we only performed operations on an entire (multidimensional) array, to access a specific element we use its index

array.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 program array_sum implicit none intrinsic :: size integer :: ndim, i, vec_sum integer, allocatable :: vec(:) ! read the dimension of the vector first read(*, *) ndim ! request the necessary memory allocate(vec(ndim)) ! now read the ndim elements of the vector read(*, *) vec vec_sum = 0 do i = 1, size(vec) vec_sum = vec_sum + vec(i) end do write(*, *) "Sum of all elements", vec_sum end program array_sum 

The above program provides a similar functionality to the intrinsic sum function.

Exercise 10

1. Reproduce the functionality of product, maxval and minval, compare to the intrinsic functions.

2. What happens when you read or write out side the bounds of the array?

Solutions 10

Let’s try to read one element past the size of the array and add this elements to the sum (do i = 1, size(vec)+1):

./array_sum
10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sum of all elements         331


Tip

Using fpm would have caught this error by default. You would see the run time error message shown below already at this stage.

Since we provided ten elements which are all one, we expect 10 as result, but get a different number. So what is element 11 of our array of size 10? We have gone out-of-bounds for the array, whatever is beyond the bounds of our array, we are not supposed to know or care.

Checking out-of-bounds errors is not enabled by default, we enable it by recompiling our program and now found a helpful message

gfortran array_sum.f90 -fcheck=bounds -o array_sum
./array_sum
10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
At line 14 of file array_sum.f90
Fortran runtime error: Index '11' of dimension 1 of array 'vec' above upper bound of 10

Error termination. Backtrace:
#0  0x55fc72c90530 in ???
#1  0x55fc72c9062f in ???
#2  0x7ff5c6e57152 in ???
#3  0x55fc72c9014d in ???
#4  0xffffffffffffffff in ???


By using the intrinsic functions like size it is garanteered that you will stay inside the array bounds.

## Functions and Subroutines¶

In the last exercise you wrote implementations for sum, product, maxval and minval, but since they are inlined in the program we cannot really reuse them. For this purpose we introduce functions and subroutines:

sum_func.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 program array_sum implicit none interface function sum_func(vector) result(vector_sum) integer, intent(in) :: vector(:) integer :: vector_sum end function sum_func end interface integer :: ndim integer, allocatable :: vec(:) ! read the dimension of the vector first read(*, *) ndim ! request the necessary memory allocate(vec(ndim)) ! now read the ndim elements of the vector read(*, *) vec write(*, *) "Sum of all elements", sum_func(vec) end program array_sum function sum_func(vector) result(vector_sum) implicit none intrinsic :: size integer, intent(in) :: vector(:) integer :: vector_sum, i vector_sum = 0 do i = 1, size(vector) vector_sum = vector_sum + vector(i) end do end function sum_func 

In the above program we have separated the implementation of the summation to an external function called sum_func we provided an interface to allow our main program to access the new function. We have to introduce a dummy argument (called vector) and have to specify its intent, here it is in because we do not modify it (other intents are out and inout). When invoking the function we pass vec as vector to our summation function which returns the sum for us.

Note that we now have two declaration sections in our file, one for our program and one for the implementation of our summation function. You might also notice that writing interfaces might become cumbersome fast, so there is a better mechanism we want to use here:

sum_func.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 module array_funcs implicit none contains function sum_func(vector) result(vector_sum) intrinsic :: size integer, intent(in) :: vector(:) integer :: vector_sum, i vector_sum = 0 do i = 1, size(vector) vector_sum = vector_sum + vector(i) end do end function sum_func end module array_funcs program array_sum use array_funcs implicit none integer :: ndim integer, allocatable :: vec(:) ! read the dimension of the vector first read(*, *) ndim ! request the necessary memory allocate(vec(ndim)) ! now read the ndim elements of the vector read(*, *) vec write(*, *) "Sum of all elements", sum_func(vec) end program array_sum 

We wrap implementation of the summation now into a module which ensures the correct interface is generated automatically and made available by adding the use statement to the main program.

Exercise 11

1. Implement your product, maxval and minval function in the array_funcs module. Compare your results with your previous programs.

2. Write functions to perform the scalar product between two vectors and reuse it to write a function for matrix-vector multiplications. Compare to the intrinsic functions dot_product and matmul.

When writing functions like the above ones, we follow a specific scheme, all arguments are not modified (intent(in)) and we return a single variable. There are cases were we do not want to return a value, in this case we would return nothing, functions of this kind are called subroutines

sum_sub.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 module array_funcs implicit none contains subroutine sum_sub(vector, vector_sum) intrinsic :: size integer, intent(in) :: vector(:) integer, intent(out) :: vector_sum integer :: i vector_sum = 0 do i = 1, size(vector) vector_sum = vector_sum + vector(i) end do end subroutine sum_sub end module array_funcs program array_sum use array_funcs implicit none integer :: ndim integer, allocatable :: vec(:) integer :: vec_sum ! read the dimension of the vector first read(*, *) ndim ! request the necessary memory allocate(vec(ndim)) ! now read the ndim elements of the vector read(*, *) vec call sum_sub(vec, vec_sum) write(*, *) "Sum of all elements", vec_sum end program array_sum 

On the first glance, subroutines have several disadvantages compared to functions, we need to explicitly declare a temporary variable, also we cannot use them inline with another instruction. This holds true for short and simple operations, here functions should be preferred over subroutines. On the other hand, if the code in the subroutine gets more complicated and the number of dummy arguments grows, we should prefer subroutines, because they are more visible in the code, especially due to the explicit call keyword.

### Multidimensional Arrays¶

We will be dealing in the following chapter with multidimensional arrays, usually in form of rank two arrays (matrices). Matrices are stored continuously in memory following a column major ordering, this means the innermost index of any higher rank array will represent continuous memory.

Reading a rank two array should be done by

array_rank.f90
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 program array_rank implicit none intrinsic :: selected_real_kind ! kind parameter for real variables integer, parameter :: wp = selected_real_kind(15) integer :: i integer :: d1, d2 real(wp), allocatable :: arr2(:, :) read(*, *) d1, d2 allocate(arr2(d1, d2)) do i = 1, size(arr2, 2) read(*, *) arr2(:, i) end do end program array_rank 

This ensures that the complete array is filled in unit strides, i.e. visiting all elements of the array in exactly the order they are stored in memory. Making sure the memory access is in unit strides usually allows compilers to produce more efficient programs.

Tip

Array slices should preferrably used on continuous memory, practically this means a colon should only be present in the innermost dimensions of an array.

array2 = array3(:, :, i)


Storing data, like cartesian coordinates, should follow the same considerations. It is always preferrable to have the three cartesian components of the position close to each other in memory.

## Character Constants and Variables¶

The character data type consists of strings of alphanumeric characters. You have already used character constants, which are strings of characters enclosed in single (') or double (") quotes, like in your very first Fortran program. The minimum number of characters in a string is 0.

 1 2 3 write(*, *) "This is a valid character constant!" write(*, *) '3.1415936' ! not a number write(*, *) "{']!=" ! any character can be included, even ! 

A character variable is a variable containing a value of the character data type:

 1 2 3 4 character :: single character, dimension(20) :: many character(len=20) :: fname character(len=:), allocatable :: input 
• the first variable single can contain only a single character

• like before one could try to create an array-like many containing many characters, but it turns out that this is not a viable approach to deal with characters

• Fortran offers a better way to make use of the character data type by adding a length to the variable, like its done for fname.

• a more flexible way of declaring your character variables is to use a so called deferred size character, like input.

To write certain data neatly to the screen format specifiers can be used, which are character constants or variables. Consider your addition program from the beginning of this course:

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 program add implicit none ! declare variables: integers integer :: a, b integer :: res ! assign values a = 2 b = 4 ! perform calculation res = a + b write(*,'(a,1x,i0)') 'Program has finished, result is', res end program add 

Instead of using the asterisk, we now define the format for the printout. The format must always be enclosed in parenthesis and the individual format specifier must be separated by commas. Therefore the first format specifier is a, which tells Fortran to print a character. The second specifier is one space (1x), while the last (i0) specifies an integer datatype with automatic width.

The result will look similar to your first run, but now there will only be one space between the characters and the final result. Of course, you can do more: / is a line break, f12.8 is a 12 characters wide floating-point number printout with 8 decimal places and es12.4 switches to scientific notation with only 4 decimal places.

## Interacting with Files¶

Up to now you only interacted with your Fortran program by standard input and standard output. For a more complex program a complicated input file might be necessary or the output should be saved for later analysis in a file on disk. To perform this task you need to open and close your files.

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 program files implicit none integer :: io integer :: ndim real :: var1, var2 open(file='name.inp', newunit=io) read(io,*) ndim, var1, var2 close(io) ! do some computation open(file='name.out', newunit=io) write(io,'(i0)') ndim write(io,'(2f14.8)') var1, var2 close(io) end program files 

You see that you can interact with your files like with the standard input or output, but instead of the asterisk, you need to give each file a number. Fortunately, you do not have to keep track of the numbers used, as Fortran will do this automatically for you. Of course, you can check the value of io after opening a file and will find that it is just a (negative) number used to identify the file opened.

## Application¶

Finally we have some more elaborate exercises to test what you already learned, it is not mandatory to solve the exercises here, but it will not harm as well.

Exercise 12

Calculate an approximation to π using Leibniz’ formula:

$\begin{split}\frac\pi4 = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{k}}{2k+1} \\ \Rightarrow \quad \pi \approx 4 \sum_{k=0}^{N} \frac{(-1)^{k}}{2k+1}\end{split}$

The number of summands N shall be read from command line input. Do a sensible convergence check every few summands, i.e. if the summand becomes smaller than a threshold, exit the loop.

Note that the values in the Leibniz formula alternate in sign, rewrite your program to always add two of the summands (one with positive and one with negative sign) at once. Compare the results, why do they differ?

To adjust the step-length in the loop use

do i = 1, nmax, 2
...
end do


Exercise 13

Approximately calculate the area in a unit circle to obtain π using trapezoids. The simplest way to do this is to choose a quarter circle and multiply its area by four.

Recall that the area of a trapezoid is the average of its sides times its height. The number of trapezoids shall be read from command line input.

Exercise 14

Approximately calculate π using the statistical method.

Generate pairs of random numbers (x,y) in the interval [0,1]. If they correspond to a point within the quarter circle, count them as “in”. For large numbers of pairs, the ratio of “in” to the total number of pairs should correspond to the ratio of the area of the quarter circle to the area of the square (as described by the mentioned interval).

To generate (pseudo-)random numbers in Fortran use

real(kind) :: x(dim)
call random_number(x)